Calibrated synthetic consumer panels.
Real research, in 90 seconds.

Methods built on 20+ years of human consumer research, using YOUR data to calibrate a custom synthetic panel that reflects how your customers actually answer. The result is PERVASIVE INSIGHTS — Surveys, focus groups, and a searchable library of your prior research — on demand, for about a dollar a question.

Synthetic Survey Results · n=200 · 90 sec
Q1: What matters most when choosing your dog's food?
Ingredient transparency94 (47%)
"If I can't pronounce an ingredient, I don't buy it."— Sarah M.
"Meat better be the first ingredient, or it goes back."— Janelle K.
Vet recommended76 (38%)
"My vet said grain-free was a fad. Coat looks better now."— Rachel T.
"If my vet hands me a pamphlet, that's the brand I buy."— Lisa P.
Avoid grain / fillers68 (34%)
"If corn is in the top three, I put it back."— Marcus W.
"Grain-free fixed my older lab's stomach issues."— Karen B.
Continuous Calibration
Human Survey Results · Pet Food Tracker · n=1,500
Insight: Quality cues dominate the choice — ingredient transparency, vet endorsement, and grain/filler avoidance together cited by 79% of buyers as top decision drivers.
49%
36%
32%
28%
24%
21%
18%
14%
11%
9%
Ingredient transparency Vet recommended Avoid grain / fillers Best price Brand familiar Available locally Dog likes it Skeptical of marketing Made in USA No preservatives
Source: PetCare Tracker 2025Highlighted = top 3 themes

Three deliverables. One platform. Built on your own research history.

Pervasive Insights stands up a synthetic consumer panel calibrated to your brand's actual buyer population — then makes that panel queryable on demand. Every output is cited back to the source data it draws from.

Survey results

Ask any question. Get back themed responses, quantification, and named verbatims. 200 respondents in ~90 seconds. Output looks like the survey results your team already knows how to read.

Focus groups

Multi-persona conversational sessions. Participants react, probe, and reference each other. Generated as a transcript with tone tags — same format as a moderated qual.

Searchable research library

Every prior research deck extracted, indexed, and queryable in natural language. Ask "what was the price ceiling?" — get back the actual slide from a prior wave, cited.

Three deliverables. Four sample outputs across categories.

Survey results, focus groups (transcript or report), and a searchable research library. Different questions, different output formats, same 90-second runtime. Brand identifiers are illustrative for this preview.

Survey Results · Pet Food

What matters most when choosing your dog's food?

Ingredient transparency47%
"I want to read every word on the bag. If I can't pronounce it, I don't buy it."— Sarah M.
"I check the first three ingredients. If meat isn't number one, it's back on the shelf."— Janelle K.
Vet recommended38%
"My vet said grain-free was a fad. Switched back. Coat looks better."— Rachel T.
"If my vet hands me a brand on a pamphlet, that's what I'm buying that month."— Lisa P.
Avoid grain / fillers34%
"If corn is in the top three, I put it back."— Marcus W.
"Grain-free worked for my older lab. Stomach issues went away."— Karen B.
Price per pound29%
"Two big dogs. Premium kibble adds up to a car payment."— Doug T.
"I'd love to feed them better but the math doesn't math at this price."— Anita R.
Fancy packaging skepticism16%
"My golden retriever isn't a wolf — drop the marketing."— Mike D.
"The mountain peaks and pine trees on the bag don't fool me anymore."— Chris L.
Texture / kibble preference15%
"She refuses small kibble — has to be the bigger pieces."— Tanya O.
"Wet food makes a mess. Dry only, has to crunch."— Brad H.
Made in USA preference12%
"If it says made overseas I read the label twice."— Pat S.
"I try to support American suppliers when I can afford it."— Linda F.
Sensitive stomach / allergies11%
"Sensitive formulas only — anything else and we have a mess."— Sarah J.
"My older one has kidney stuff. Prescription brand, no exceptions."— Frank N.
Marketing-driven trends9%
"Raw food trend? Hard pass. Sounds like a bacterial roulette."— Greg V.
"Every year there's a new fad. I stick with what works."— Helen K.
Focus Group · Streaming Services

When you sit down on a Friday night, what's actually going through your head?

Rebecca P.[Frustrated] Honestly? Decision fatigue. I scroll between Netflix and Hulu for 20 minutes and end up rewatching The Office.
Moderator: When you say "decision fatigue," what makes it feel like work?
Rebecca P.[Reflective] Every service has its own vault. I have to remember which show is on which app. The mental load is the worst part.
Doug L.[Pragmatic] I cancelled HBO and resubscribed three times last year. I sign up for one show, watch it, cancel.
Tara N.[Warm] My husband and I do that. We treat it like a magazine subscription — pick it up, set it down.
Focus Group Report · Streaming Services

Streaming Services — How People Actually Choose

2 groups · 8 participants · synthetic panel · same study as transcript above
TOPLINE: Decision fatigue was the dominant finding — 7 of 8 cited the cross-app vault problem as their primary friction. The most common coping behavior was the "magazine subscription" pattern: subscribe, watch one show, cancel. Loyalty exists, but it attaches to specific shows, not platforms.
KEY DIFFERENCES
• 5 of 8 actively rotate subscriptions — sign up for one show, watch, cancel.
• Comfort shows (e.g., The Office) function as fallback when decision overload hits.
• Loyalty attaches to shows, not platforms — viewers follow content across apps.
Sentiment
Frustrated 22% · Pragmatic 28% · Warm 18% · Reflective 12% · Neutral 14% · Other 6%
Library · Research Synthesis

"What media channels drive the most brand awareness for our category?"

HIGH CONFIDENCE 8 slides · 1 project FRESHNESS · 2.8 yr
Top Information-Gathering Channels (Media Profile Study, n=1,000)
Overall: Online research (62%), TV/streaming (55%), promotional emails (52%), online ads (49%) led across the category.
Males: indexed heavily on online research (62%), TV/streaming (55%), YouTube (27%), radio/podcasts. Among purchase-influence channels: online research (29%), TV/streaming (15%), social media (14%), YouTube (11%).
Females: in-store ads (53%), Amazon (39%), retailer websites (39%), retailer emails (38%). Over-indexed on social media, print mailers, and style/fashion magazines.
Social Media Ad Awareness (Media Profile, n=1,000)
Overall: Facebook dominates social ad awareness, followed by YouTube and Instagram.
Males: Facebook 18%, YouTube 13%, Instagram 9%, X/Twitter 5%. Males 40-50 over-index on YouTube (16%).
Females: Facebook 23%, YouTube 11%, Instagram 10%, Pinterest 9%, TikTok 7%. Females 40-50 elevated TikTok awareness (11% vs. 7%).
Online Information Sources
Overall: Amazon (46-52%), retailer websites (41-48%), and search engines (40-46%) are the primary online research tools — all outranking social platforms.
Strategic Implication
For the male core, TV/streaming, online research, and YouTube are the highest-reach and -influence channels. For females, retailer emails, Amazon, social, and print mailers drive the most ad awareness.
Sources cited: Media Profile Results · 2023 · Slides 42, 47, 48, 52, 53, 57, 58, 60

Using human survey results to calibrate synthetic panel results — same questions, same population.

Anyone can stand up a synthetic panel. The question is whether it actually answers like your real customers do. Pervasive Insights is calibrated to your commissioned research — and the calibration is auditable. Below: the same questions run through human respondents and through the synthetic panel. Distributions match within ~3 percentage points on every cell.

Brand Awareness · 4 brands
Avg Δ 2.5pp
"Which of these brands have you heard of? (Select all that apply)"
Human survey · n=1,500 Synthetic panel · n=50
Brand AΔ 3pp
Human67%
Synthetic64%
Brand BΔ 3pp
Human42%
Synthetic39%
Brand CΔ 3pp
Human18%
Synthetic21%
Brand DΔ 1pp
Human9%
Synthetic8%
Human field: 14 days · ~$22,000 Synthetic: 90 sec · ~$5
Purchase Intent · 5-pt scale
Avg Δ 2.0pp
"Based on this description, how likely would you be to purchase this product?"
Human concept test · n=400 Synthetic panel · n=50
Definitely would purchaseΔ 3pp
Human8%
Synthetic11%
Probably wouldΔ 2pp
Human28%
Synthetic26%
Might or might notΔ 2pp
Human35%
Synthetic33%
Probably would notΔ 2pp
Human19%
Synthetic21%
Definitely would notΔ 1pp
Human10%
Synthetic9%
Human field: 21 days · ~$38,000 Synthetic: 90 sec · ~$5

Across all 19 marketing topic areas, Pervasive Insights reproduces real survey distributions to within an average of 3.5 percentage points per cell. Calibration error is reported per topic area, per segment, and audited every time new tracker data comes in. The synthetic panel doesn't replace your human research — it lets you query that research base instantly between waves.

From your historic research to on-demand outputs.

No new fielding required to start. We build the synthetic panel from data you already have — then keep tuning it as new tracker waves come in.

1

Your research

We index every commissioned study you've run — surveys, focus groups, trackers, ad tests. Years of source data, all in one place.

2

Calibration

We build identity cards calibrated against your actual respondents. Every dimension on every card is anchored in real data, not guessed.

3

Synthetic panel

5,000 calibrated identities sit in your portal, ready for any question. They speak in your customers' voice — drawn from your real verbatims.

4

On-demand research

Run a survey, a focus group, or a concept test in 90 seconds. Get back the same kind of deliverable you commission today — in minutes, for about a dollar a question.

Calibrated. Auditable. Cited back to source.

Every dimension on every identity card is anchored in real survey data. Calibration error is reported per node, per segment. Nothing is generated from thin air.

~3.5pp
Average distribution error against real survey data, across all 19 marketing topic areas.
5,000
Calibrated identity cards per client, drawn to match the actual buyer population.
4,125
Source documents indexed and queryable per client portal — surveys, transcripts, prior decks.
~$1
Per question, per readout. ~90 seconds runtime. Run as much research as your team can absorb.
City Research Solutions facility

Twenty-plus years of commissioned consumer research, made queryable on demand.

Pervasive Insights is a product of City Research Solutions — a Midwest-based consumer research firm with more than two decades of category experience.

CRS has fielded 90+ commissioned research projects across categories spanning workwear, outdoor power equipment, outdoor furniture, personal care, food and CPG, tools and hardware, retail, and more. Every Pervasive Insights client portal is built directly on top of that client's own commissioned research history — calibrated to the buyer population they've been measuring for years.

The synthetic panel is not generic. It's yours.

A City Research Solutions product · Pervasive Insights™ 2026 · Visit CRS →

Schedule a 30-minute walkthrough.

Tell us a little about your category and the kind of research questions you wrestle with most often. We'll send back available times within one business day.